F.Nits, in his labour "Science of the basic financial principles," wrote : "People, according to the old tradition, pay taxes by their property,gentry by his blood and clergy with prayers". In that case it is interesting Ph.Golbakh's opinion,according to which it is essential to behave like this that the tax to be universal,this burden should be beared by all of subjects . Liberation from the taxes creates injustices and inequalities among the citizens.
Of course this principle can't be absolutised,because the right of existence has a situation,when vulnerable persons who are in need of social assistance (pensioners, the disabled, the unemployed) are free from the tax payment. In this case the principle of equality isn't violated,because there is a redistribution of income and tax differentiation process.And this completely responds to the principle of social justice.
While discussing this issue, the starting point is the fact that justice is the basis of equality,which in some scientists opinion is its essence.In the present situation,the main function of justice is to achieve equality and not to immortal of irregularity...Implication that the law equally diffuses to all persons in any situation and in spite of their category: without any rich and the poor, elites and ordinary people.The law, which is used without discrimination, can be considered the embodiment of justice.From the for said taxpayers equality can be considered as a just taxation.In this case, the issue is related to the case of private equality which is based on international law by the universally recognized principle of non-discrimination.Basic human rights and freedoms for the protection of the Convention (Rome, 4 November 1950), according to the 14th article of the rights and freedoms must be provided for each without any discrimination.The principle of equal tax burden is expressed by taxpayers.At the same time, the principle of equality of taxation and the tax burden equal confusion can not be identified , because the first is much broader in its content.
Tax legislation is quite important principle of priority.Its essence is that the regulations,which aren't related to taxation purposes should not contain standards that will establish specific provisions on taxation.This means that if the "non-tax" laws contain standards which is related to tax relations,then they may be used only if they are reinforced by the tax legislation norms. Thus, the standards should be used only during the collision of the tax provisions of the laws. This principle can not be extended, because it applies only to cases in which tax rules are.